David Axelrod lies about Barack Obama's statements. Again.

By Soren Dayton Posted in | | | | Comments (11) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

Barack Obama's Chief Strategist is simply lying about Barack Obama's statements about Iraq:



David Axelrod is developing a pattern of lying to the press. A previous lie about Obama's statements on John McCain's position on Iraq. See that video after the jump.


"Land of the Free and Home of da Whopper" Peter Griffin...Family Guy

conform and celebrate diversity....or else!!!

is to quote him or her accurately.
The way lefty's defeat Conservatives is to lie about what they say.

interesting by Pentagon16

FINALLY someone smart on the GOP side is actually cutting and splicing all the youtube clips together to show what a liar and incompetent this guy is..

now we just need to add Iran, Farrakhan, Wright, Pfleger, white grandma, 57 states, bitter people and Castro to the roll of TV clips to show in 1 minute ads throughout the summer.

we win if we get out the truth about this guy. we just need some technologically savvy guys to start taking youtube clips and pasting them together into tough ads..

"Small town folks get bitter after which they cling to guns or religion, or antipathy to people who aren't like them, or anti-immigrant sentiment"- Barack Carter Obama

From his mouth by Maggie in Indiana

to god's ears. How can anyone dispute their own words?

Is David Axelrod the Chief Strategist on "Harpooning Obama's Campaign"?

I mean, really! If Obama and his chief strategist (of something or another) can't get on the same page, how the hell is he going to run the bloody country?

Join The Revolution!
BigGator5.net
John McCain for 2008!

obama made this statement after a speech to the VFW (Aug 2007). The surge was showing signs of success, no? what does obama think now?

“What I had been clear about, I think, even before the surge started was that if we put an additional 20,000 or 30,000 American troops in Baghdad that it’s going to have an impact,” Mr. Obama said. “They are doing an outstanding job in carrying out their military operations. The question has always been, What then?”

No, that's not what you said, Obama. You said the opposite.

You said eve if we put in 20 or thirty thousand it would not succeed. That is the opposite of what you're saying now, just a few months later, since events in Iraq have not played out as you so confidently predicted they would.

Getting Dizzy by Whitehorse

from the spin. Obama & his team are spinning like dervishes. Will they say we're not "nuanced" enough to understand what they mean? If McCain & his team will play all these cards they've been dealt, McCain should win pretty handily - I think enough of the American people can spot BS when they see it.

Not Only This by ICRJCalvin

but more is coming to light about Obama's Marxist roots.

http://samuelatgilgal.wordpress.com/2008/05/31/is-barack-obama-a-marxist...

--------------------

Small is beautiful.

Indeed by SteveLA

It should be used through the whole general election.

What they say now, what they used to say.

Compare and Contrast.

______________________________________
Proud member of the Barry Goldwater wing of the party !

Relativism by Andysforsmalgovernment

To go along with moral relativism, the left now introduces:

Temporal Relativism. What I said last week, was last week. Now I'm saying something this week. Different week, Different words. Get it?

"Government of the people, by the people, for the people."
A. Lincoln

 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password?)


©2008 Eagle Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service