Chris Matthews: Running for Senate from the Bully Pulpit of the “news” desk?


As I said at Politico’s Arena earlier today, Chris Matthews certainly has as much right to compete for a U.S. Senate seat as Al Franken, Jim Martin, or any other individual who wishes to inject him or herself into national politics as both candidate and legislator.

As a former aide to Tip O’Neill (and former candidate, having run for the House of Representatives in 1974 and lost by a landslide) and longtime “news” man, Matthews is far from being a stranger in the world campaigns and inside-the-beltway politics.

However, Matthews’s apparent decision to begin laying the groundwork for a Senate run in 2010 while still hosting a “news analysis” program on MSNBC, which purports (despite all evidence to the contrary) to be a “news” network, is a problem.

According to Roll Call, Matthews is “meeting with top Democratic fundraisers as well as statewide officials” and has made “an informal agreement with Philadelphia-based Democratic media consultant Neil Oxman to work for his campaign, should he decide to run.”Matthews’s political proclivities have, of course, been clear for years, though his vocality during the Bush years and the presidential campaign of 2007/8 cast them into still sharper relief. From openly raving about the fact that watching then-candidate Barack Obama speak sent a “tingle” up his leg, to calling the former Illinois Senator’s campaign “the New Testament,” to, just after the November 4 election that saw Obama chosen as the nation’s 44th president, claiming that his new “job” was to “do everything [he] can to make this thing work, this new presidency work,” because “this country needs a successful presidency,” Matthews’s pro-Democratic, pro-Obama agenda has been in full view of the public, despite the fact that he has been propagating that agenda from behind a supposedly objective “news” desk.

Of course, for all the bellyaching on the part of the Left about Fox News’s journalistic tilt, MSNBC has set a high bar indeed for political advocacy and activism disguised as news. The presence of Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow, among others, in the MSNBC lineup has doubtless pushed Matthews to up his anti-Bush and pro-Obama/Democratic advocacy in an effort to simply retain MSNBC’s core viewers.

However, advocacy from the “news” desk — as deplorable and utterly counter to all journalistic ethics as it is — is one thing; using that desk as a bully pulpit from which to campaign for national office is another. Though I applaud Matthews for actually providing an honest voicing of his views and political leanings — something very few do in journalism, preferring instead to hide behind the false veneer of “objectivity” — the fact that he remains on the air while openly negotiating terms for his candidacy for the U.S. Senate gives the lie to any and all claims by MSNBC to be a “news” organization, and instead reveals it to be the real version of what the Left has spent years claiming that Fox News is: an faux-news outlet which attempts to cover its partisan advocacy with the veneer of “objective” reporting.

Category: , , , ,

Stunt Prosecution of Cheney, Gonzales Tossed


On technical procedural grounds, but the judge advised the prosecutor (himself a former criminal defendant) not to come back:

“I suggest on behalf of the law that you not present any cases to the grand jury involving these defendants,” Banales said in court while ruling that eight indictments against Cheney, Gonzales and others were invalid. According to the AP, Banales withheld judgment on whether probable cause existed for the Cheney and Gonzales indictments because they were not represented in court and did not present any arguments. For the other defendants, he found no probable cause to support the charges.

Category:

Bullets and the Victoria Terminus


Not surprisingly, there's no news...

Well, it looks like nobody’s talking, at least anyone who has any authority to talk about whether the 60+ police stationed in Mumbai at the Victoria Terminus had any ammunition to put in their WWI-vintage rifles and shoot back at two people who murdered at least ten innocents in cold blood and wounded scores more.

I didn’t expect there would be much of a revelation, because it would call into question an awful lot of the rest of the police forces in India. Right now nobody has answered the question definitively and it appears that nobody will.

Until a few years from now.

It’s one of those questions that is very disturbing to ask, because the wrong answer would speak to the security provided by Indian police across the entire subcontinent. It’s not surprising that everyone has kept mum.

My sincere guess is that none of the 60+ officers at Victoria Terminus could have fired their weapons even if they had wanted to. It’s the only theory that could explain why none of them did, except abject cowardice or complicity.

In the Times of London there is a revealing article (which still doesn’t definitely answer our question):

Maharashtra state, of which Mumbai is the capital, has one of India’s better police forces, but even it is woefully ill-equipped because of a centralised and highly corrupt procurement system.

Some officers said that they were not given enough weapons training because of a shortage of ammunition and shooting ranges. In theory, all officers shoot 50 rounds a year in training. In practice, senior officers get their full quota with small arms.

“The rest is all bunkum,” Mr Pereira said. “It’s target practice with a .303 rifle. I wouldn’t call it suitable knowledge of weapons and their uses in urban policing.”

“It’s a cartel,” Mr Singh said. “The Government is spending millions, but the police isn’t getting the equipment it needs.”

The Indian police forces need to clean up their act, get the graft out of their system, and start putting bullets back in the guns carried by their officers. And they should also stop preventing law-abiding citizens in India from being armed for their own protection.

Before the world winds up in World War III and Pakistan nukes India or the reverse, it might be wise if the Indian police forces started training and equipping their officers adequately, and establishing a legitimate path for citizens to own and carry functional firearms.

In fact the last suggestion is better than anything else given the corruption that evidently exists in the Indian police system. I don’t place much faith in that structural institutional problem being solved any time soon.

Category: ,

The Barack Obama Day…celebration of a neophite


And a paid holiday at that!!

From Brietbart via Drudge

Apparently the Perry County Commission decided they needed a paid day of in order to celebrate Barack Obama’s presidential win. Granted, electing a black man is historic but he hasn’t even governed anything yet, not to mention succeeded at governing.

The employees of the county will get a day off and the taxpayers of the county won’t. Well I guess all I can say is you get the gov’t you deserve…even at the county level.

Category:

Re: Holder


Unsurprisingly, Pejman, I agree.

Category: , , ,

Killer Wind Turbines


Green Future Looking Very Human-Unfriendly

Well, how about this.

When wind turbines sit in sub-freezing temperatures, the turbine blades (not surprisingly) tend to accumulate ice and snow.

And then when the wind kicks up and they begin to spin, they start to throw off potentially-lethal chunks of ice in all directions.

That “green future” is looking increasingly unfriendly to humans….

Category: , , , , ,

The Eric Holder Appointment


Yeah, I still think it’s a mistake.

Category: , ,

“The Pre-Public Choice View”


Or “There’s nothing special about bureaucrats. They are just like you and me. And that should make you afraid.”

Category: , ,

Conservatives put Obama over the top?


Color me skeptical

This article is intriguing, even though I’m not sure I really believe it in total. But he makes a couple of interesting observations:

Most conservatives did show up on Election Day, but a significant number voted Democrat. Mr. Obama picked up one-third more conservative voters than Sen. John Kerry, at 20 percent. Self-identified conservatives in exit polling comprised 34 percent of voters in both 2004 and 2008, yet the number who called themselves Republican dropped from 37 percent to 32 percent. In an evenly split nation, the GOP losing 14 percent of its base overwhelmed almost everything else.

and

Two key right-leaning constituencies deserted Republicans: security moms and Catholics. Though the media has made the “gender gap” a household term, the more apt classification was a “marriage gap.” Single women were heavily Democrat, and married women leaned Republican. “Security Moms” became the label for married mothers attracted to the hawkishness of the GOP.

Hmmmm.

Category: ,

Comparing Georgia’s retention rate for the runoff.


Looking at CNN’s numbers, Chambliss had 64%… and Martin had 51%. Yup. That’s one impressive turnout machine that the Democrats have bought for themselves. An impressive turnout machine… as long as you only need it to do one thing.

A real shame that Presidents don’t serve two-year terms, isn’t it?

Category: ,